Difficulties in Learning ‘Cohesive ties’ in English, Dynamic Assessment and Integrated Mediation Strategy
الكلمات المفتاحية:
Cohesive ties, technology, learning difficulties, mediation strategy, assessment
الملخص
Learning English can sometimes be challenging especially in a place where it is not a lingua franca. Since the learners are unable to grab any good opportunity to practice target language, they face difficulties in productive skills: speaking and writing. Among many other crucial problems, ‘Cohesive ties’ are considered as quite crucial. The proposed study is a modest attempt towards studying the nature, types and causes of learning difficulties in the area of the cohesive ties. It is also suggested as to how evolution of a compatible technology mediated mediation strategy for learning and teaching of the English language elements with special reference to cohesive ties. As we know teaching strategy can’t be fruitful unless we diagnose learning strategy, therefore in this systematic review, Dynamic Assessment (DA) will be studied to explore its benefits.
المراجع
1. Abdilaal, M. A. A. D., Alenazi, M.H., Tajuddin, A.J.A. et al.(2022).Dynamic vsDiagnosic Assessment: impacts on EFL learners’ speaking fluency and accuracy, learning anxiety, and cognitive load. Lang Test Asia 12, 32. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40468-022-00179-0
2. Al-Jarf, R.S. (2001). Processing of Cohesive Ties by EFL Arab College Students. Foreign Language Annals, 32(2), 141-151
3. Alqahtani, M.S.M. &Elumalai, K.V. (2020). Analysis of Lexical and Cohesive Ties usage in Undergraduate Students’ Writing by Applying Task-Based Language Learning Methodology. AWEJ. 11(1), 79 -90 DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol11no1.7
4. Al-Zubeiry, H. (2020). Coherence Problems in the English Writings of Saudi University Students. Coherence Problems in the English Writings of Saudi University Students, Journal of Umm Al-Qura University for Language Sciences and Literature, Issue. 25, pp. 405-431.https://doi.org/10.54940/ll34876557
5. Andujar, A. (2020). ReCALL : the Journal of EUROCALL; Cambridge Vol. 32( 2), 178-194. doi:10.1017/S0958344019000247
6. Babamoradi, P., Nasiri, M., Mohammadi,E. (2018). Learners’ Attitudes toward Using Dynamic Assessment in Teaching and Assessing IELTS Writing Task One. International Journal of Language Testing Vol. 8, No. 1
7. Bruner, J. (1987). Prologue to the English Edition. In: Rieber, R.W., Carton, A.S. (eds) The Collected Works of L. S. Vygotsky. Cognition and Language. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-1655-8_1
8. Bui, H. P. (2022). Vietnamese EFL Students’ Use and Misconceptions of Cohesive Devices in Writing. SAGE Open, 12(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440221126993
9. Calderhead, J., & Miller, E. (1985). The integration of subject matter knowledge in student teachers' classroom practice. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the British Educational Research Association, Sheffield
10. Dixon-Krauss, L.A. (1992). Whole language: Bridging the gap from spontaneous to scientific concepts, Journal of Reading Education, 18, 13-17.
11. Ebadi, S., &Saeedian, A. (2015). The Effects of Computerized Dynamic Assessment on Promoting At-Risk Advanced Iranian EFL Students’ Reading Skills. Issues in Language Teaching, 4(2), 26-1. doi: 10.22054/ilt.2015.7224
12. Etemadi, S. H., &Abbasian, G.-R. (2023). Dynamic assessment and EFL learners' writing journey: Focus on DA modalities and writing revision types. Teaching English Language, 17(1), 53-79. https://doi.org/10.22132/TEL.2022.162923
13. Haez, S.G. &Delfani, M. (2022).The Impact of Online Dynamic Assessment on the Development of EFL Students’ Speaking Skills: A Comparison of Online Synchronous and Asynchronous DA Sessions, International TESOL Journal Volume 17 Issue 1
14. Jayanti, D., Hidayat, N. (2021).Grammatical Cohesive Devices in Reading Text: A Discourse Analysis of English Test for Junior High School. Journal of English Teaching AdiBuana, Vol. 06 No. 01
15. Kaveh, A., &Rassaei, E. (2022). Mobile-Mediated Versus Face-to-Face Dynamic Assessment, EFL Learners’ Writing Fluency, and Strategy Awareness: A Socio-cultural Perspective. Language and Sociocultural Theory, 9(1), 34–68. https://doi.org/10.1558/lst.20288
16. Khorami F. S. , Derakhshi Z. (2019). On the Role of Dynamic Assessment on Promotion of Writing Linguistic Accuracy among EFL Learners: An Interventionist Model. IJREE 2019; 4 (2)
17. Kozulin, A., & Garb, E. (2002). Dynamic assessment of EFL text comprehension of at-risk students. School Psychology International, 23(1), 112-127.
18. Lampert, M., & Clark, C.M. (1990). Expert knowledge and expert thinking in teaching: A response to Floden and Klinzing. Educational Researcher, 19, 21-23
19. Moll, L. C. (2000). Inspired by Vygotsky: Ethnographic experiments in education. In C. Lee & P. Smagorinsky (Eds.), Vygotskian perspectives on literacy research (pp. 256–268). New York: Cambridge University Press.
20. Poehner, M. E. (2005). Dynamic Assessment of Oral Proficiency among Advanced L2 Learners of French (Unpublished dissertation). Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA
21. Poehner, M. E. (2008). Dynamic Assessment: A Vygotskian Approach to Understanding and Promoting L2 Development. Springer, New York.
22. Rashidi, N., &BahadoriNejad, Z. (2018). An Investigation Into the Effect of Dynamic Assessment on the EFL Learners’ Process Writing Development. SAGE Open, 8(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244018784643
23. Saleh, M., Anggani, D., Bharati, L., Kifti, H. Islami, K.H. (2022). The Use of Cohesive Devices in Descriptive Text by English Training Participants at PST”. English Education Journal,12 (1) (2022) 96-103 http://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/eej
24. SolmazMovahed Far, Gholam-Reza Abbasian , Ali-Reza Ameri (2022). Computer-Based Dynamic Assessment of EFL Learners’ Writing Performance: Evidence from Both Cognitive and Emotive Domains. Journal of Language and Translation Volume 12, Number 3, pp. 1-19
25. Rad, H.,S. (2021). Exploring Use of Mobile-mediated Hybrid Dynamic Assessment in Improving EFL Learners' Descriptive Writing Skills. Computer Assisted Language Learning Electronic Journal, 22(1), 111-132
26. Rassaei, E. (2023). Implementing mobile-mediated dynamic assessment for teaching request forms to EFL learners, Computer Assisted Language Learning, 36:3, 257-287, DOI: 10.1080/09588221.2021.1912105
27. Rezaei, A., Behjat, F., &Bagheri, M. S. (2022). The Effect of Mobile-mediated Dynamic Assessment on EFL Learners’ L2 Vocabulary Knowledge. Research in English Language Pedagogy, 10(3), 467-489. doi: 10.30486/relp.2021.1945291.1320
28. Sherkuziyeva, N., ImamutdinovnaGabidullina, F., Ahmed Abdel-Al Ibrahim, K. et al. (2023). The comparative effect of computerized dynamic assessment and rater mediated assessment on EFL learners’ oral proficiency, writing performance, and test anxiety. Lang Test Asia 13, 15
29. Sung, Y.-T., Chang, K.-E., & Liu, T.-Z. (2016). The effect of integrating mobile devices with teaching and learning on students’ learning performance: A meta-analysis and research synthesis. Computers & Education, 94, 252–275.
30. Thị, P.&Hương, T. (2022). Investigating Cohesive Devices Used in Vietnamese EFL Students’ Online English Writings. Baltic Journal of Law & Politics15:3(2022): 2218-2234DOI: 10.2478/bjlp-2022-002151
31. Vergara, L., Caraballo, J., Castellon, D., Vásquez, C, y Becker, E. (2019). Dynamic Assessment Approach in Language Teaching: A Review. ZonaProxima, 30, 82-99.
32. Vollmeyer, R., &Rheinberg, F. (2000). Does motivation affect performance via persistence? Learning and Instruction, 10, 293-309
33. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind and Society: The Development of Higher Mental Processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University
34. Wahby, M (2014).The effect of implementing cohesive ties by Saudi prep-year pre intermediate students on their written texts. European Scientific Journal February 2014 , vol.10, No.4
35. WidatAllah, H.A.Y. (2021). Problems of Using Cohesive Devices in Academic Writing among Students at Sudan University of Science and Technology. https://repository.sustech.edu/bitstream/handle/123456789/27463/Problems%20of%20Using%20....pdf?sequence=1
36. YassirShaeerHameed&Ala'a Ismael Challob(2022). Synonymy as a Cohesive Device in Students' English Essay Writing. Al-Adab Journal – No. 140-(1) (March) 2022 / 1443
37. Zeng, S., Xu,M., and Chen, X.(2019). "Developing a computerized dynamic assessment system for Chinese EFL learners," 2019 14th International Conference on Computer Science & Education (ICCSE), Toronto, ON, Canada, 2019, pp. 444-447, doi: 10.1109/ICCSE.2019.8845051.
2. Al-Jarf, R.S. (2001). Processing of Cohesive Ties by EFL Arab College Students. Foreign Language Annals, 32(2), 141-151
3. Alqahtani, M.S.M. &Elumalai, K.V. (2020). Analysis of Lexical and Cohesive Ties usage in Undergraduate Students’ Writing by Applying Task-Based Language Learning Methodology. AWEJ. 11(1), 79 -90 DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol11no1.7
4. Al-Zubeiry, H. (2020). Coherence Problems in the English Writings of Saudi University Students. Coherence Problems in the English Writings of Saudi University Students, Journal of Umm Al-Qura University for Language Sciences and Literature, Issue. 25, pp. 405-431.https://doi.org/10.54940/ll34876557
5. Andujar, A. (2020). ReCALL : the Journal of EUROCALL; Cambridge Vol. 32( 2), 178-194. doi:10.1017/S0958344019000247
6. Babamoradi, P., Nasiri, M., Mohammadi,E. (2018). Learners’ Attitudes toward Using Dynamic Assessment in Teaching and Assessing IELTS Writing Task One. International Journal of Language Testing Vol. 8, No. 1
7. Bruner, J. (1987). Prologue to the English Edition. In: Rieber, R.W., Carton, A.S. (eds) The Collected Works of L. S. Vygotsky. Cognition and Language. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-1655-8_1
8. Bui, H. P. (2022). Vietnamese EFL Students’ Use and Misconceptions of Cohesive Devices in Writing. SAGE Open, 12(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440221126993
9. Calderhead, J., & Miller, E. (1985). The integration of subject matter knowledge in student teachers' classroom practice. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the British Educational Research Association, Sheffield
10. Dixon-Krauss, L.A. (1992). Whole language: Bridging the gap from spontaneous to scientific concepts, Journal of Reading Education, 18, 13-17.
11. Ebadi, S., &Saeedian, A. (2015). The Effects of Computerized Dynamic Assessment on Promoting At-Risk Advanced Iranian EFL Students’ Reading Skills. Issues in Language Teaching, 4(2), 26-1. doi: 10.22054/ilt.2015.7224
12. Etemadi, S. H., &Abbasian, G.-R. (2023). Dynamic assessment and EFL learners' writing journey: Focus on DA modalities and writing revision types. Teaching English Language, 17(1), 53-79. https://doi.org/10.22132/TEL.2022.162923
13. Haez, S.G. &Delfani, M. (2022).The Impact of Online Dynamic Assessment on the Development of EFL Students’ Speaking Skills: A Comparison of Online Synchronous and Asynchronous DA Sessions, International TESOL Journal Volume 17 Issue 1
14. Jayanti, D., Hidayat, N. (2021).Grammatical Cohesive Devices in Reading Text: A Discourse Analysis of English Test for Junior High School. Journal of English Teaching AdiBuana, Vol. 06 No. 01
15. Kaveh, A., &Rassaei, E. (2022). Mobile-Mediated Versus Face-to-Face Dynamic Assessment, EFL Learners’ Writing Fluency, and Strategy Awareness: A Socio-cultural Perspective. Language and Sociocultural Theory, 9(1), 34–68. https://doi.org/10.1558/lst.20288
16. Khorami F. S. , Derakhshi Z. (2019). On the Role of Dynamic Assessment on Promotion of Writing Linguistic Accuracy among EFL Learners: An Interventionist Model. IJREE 2019; 4 (2)
17. Kozulin, A., & Garb, E. (2002). Dynamic assessment of EFL text comprehension of at-risk students. School Psychology International, 23(1), 112-127.
18. Lampert, M., & Clark, C.M. (1990). Expert knowledge and expert thinking in teaching: A response to Floden and Klinzing. Educational Researcher, 19, 21-23
19. Moll, L. C. (2000). Inspired by Vygotsky: Ethnographic experiments in education. In C. Lee & P. Smagorinsky (Eds.), Vygotskian perspectives on literacy research (pp. 256–268). New York: Cambridge University Press.
20. Poehner, M. E. (2005). Dynamic Assessment of Oral Proficiency among Advanced L2 Learners of French (Unpublished dissertation). Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA
21. Poehner, M. E. (2008). Dynamic Assessment: A Vygotskian Approach to Understanding and Promoting L2 Development. Springer, New York.
22. Rashidi, N., &BahadoriNejad, Z. (2018). An Investigation Into the Effect of Dynamic Assessment on the EFL Learners’ Process Writing Development. SAGE Open, 8(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244018784643
23. Saleh, M., Anggani, D., Bharati, L., Kifti, H. Islami, K.H. (2022). The Use of Cohesive Devices in Descriptive Text by English Training Participants at PST”. English Education Journal,12 (1) (2022) 96-103 http://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/eej
24. SolmazMovahed Far, Gholam-Reza Abbasian , Ali-Reza Ameri (2022). Computer-Based Dynamic Assessment of EFL Learners’ Writing Performance: Evidence from Both Cognitive and Emotive Domains. Journal of Language and Translation Volume 12, Number 3, pp. 1-19
25. Rad, H.,S. (2021). Exploring Use of Mobile-mediated Hybrid Dynamic Assessment in Improving EFL Learners' Descriptive Writing Skills. Computer Assisted Language Learning Electronic Journal, 22(1), 111-132
26. Rassaei, E. (2023). Implementing mobile-mediated dynamic assessment for teaching request forms to EFL learners, Computer Assisted Language Learning, 36:3, 257-287, DOI: 10.1080/09588221.2021.1912105
27. Rezaei, A., Behjat, F., &Bagheri, M. S. (2022). The Effect of Mobile-mediated Dynamic Assessment on EFL Learners’ L2 Vocabulary Knowledge. Research in English Language Pedagogy, 10(3), 467-489. doi: 10.30486/relp.2021.1945291.1320
28. Sherkuziyeva, N., ImamutdinovnaGabidullina, F., Ahmed Abdel-Al Ibrahim, K. et al. (2023). The comparative effect of computerized dynamic assessment and rater mediated assessment on EFL learners’ oral proficiency, writing performance, and test anxiety. Lang Test Asia 13, 15
29. Sung, Y.-T., Chang, K.-E., & Liu, T.-Z. (2016). The effect of integrating mobile devices with teaching and learning on students’ learning performance: A meta-analysis and research synthesis. Computers & Education, 94, 252–275.
30. Thị, P.&Hương, T. (2022). Investigating Cohesive Devices Used in Vietnamese EFL Students’ Online English Writings. Baltic Journal of Law & Politics15:3(2022): 2218-2234DOI: 10.2478/bjlp-2022-002151
31. Vergara, L., Caraballo, J., Castellon, D., Vásquez, C, y Becker, E. (2019). Dynamic Assessment Approach in Language Teaching: A Review. ZonaProxima, 30, 82-99.
32. Vollmeyer, R., &Rheinberg, F. (2000). Does motivation affect performance via persistence? Learning and Instruction, 10, 293-309
33. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind and Society: The Development of Higher Mental Processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University
34. Wahby, M (2014).The effect of implementing cohesive ties by Saudi prep-year pre intermediate students on their written texts. European Scientific Journal February 2014 , vol.10, No.4
35. WidatAllah, H.A.Y. (2021). Problems of Using Cohesive Devices in Academic Writing among Students at Sudan University of Science and Technology. https://repository.sustech.edu/bitstream/handle/123456789/27463/Problems%20of%20Using%20....pdf?sequence=1
36. YassirShaeerHameed&Ala'a Ismael Challob(2022). Synonymy as a Cohesive Device in Students' English Essay Writing. Al-Adab Journal – No. 140-(1) (March) 2022 / 1443
37. Zeng, S., Xu,M., and Chen, X.(2019). "Developing a computerized dynamic assessment system for Chinese EFL learners," 2019 14th International Conference on Computer Science & Education (ICCSE), Toronto, ON, Canada, 2019, pp. 444-447, doi: 10.1109/ICCSE.2019.8845051.
منشور
2023-04-22
كيفية الاقتباس
Ahmed Khawaji. (2023). Difficulties in Learning ‘Cohesive ties’ in English, Dynamic Assessment and Integrated Mediation Strategy. Journal of Arts, Literature, Humanities and Social Sciences, (90), 164-179. https://doi.org/10.33193/JALHSS.90.2023.817
إصدار
القسم
المقالات
