Impact of Digital Accounting Tools on Financial Decisions in Small and Medium Businesses
الملخص
Digital accounting tools play important roles for small business owner’s financial decision. The benefit of these tools ranges from ease of financial reporting, better record keeping, time efficiency, budgeting, expense control, profitability analysis and business growth planning. Small businesses in Northern Cyprus are faced with challenges such as time inefficiency, low level of organization, poor record keeping, inadequate budgeting planning, expense control, limited resource, and tax compliance. These challenges stem from inadequate tools for keeping accurate data of small businesses. The study was intent on investigating how the use of digital accounting tools has affected various facets of accounting in small businesses with the use of extended TAM. The focus was to pinpoint the gains and setbacks associated with implementing them. The research examined the impact and ease digitalization seen in the area of better record keeping, time efficiency, budgeting, expense control, profitability analysis and business growth planning. Qualitative study was undertaken employing a thematic analysis approach, utilizing semi-structured interviews to obtain comprehensive and in-depth insights from professionals and entrepreneurs in different industries and locations. The study revealed that SMEs benefited immensely by using digital accounting tools. Small business owners in Northern Cyprus reported that it improved their ease of doing business (PEU) and overall business organization (PU). Younger business owners in Northern Cyprus below 45 years were observed to participate more in the use of digital accounting compared to older business owners. There is need to sensitize the public about these benefits ranging from budget planning, expense control, cash flow forecasting, profitability analyzing, and business growth analyzing.
المراجع
2. Aljahdaly, A. H., and Balubaid, M. (2020). Business digital transformation: A study to evaluate the current digital operating model in Saudi Airlines Company to realize the impact of digital transformation. International Journal of Advanced Engineering Research and Applications, 6(1): 1–14. https://doi.org/10.46593 /ijaera.2020.v06i01.001
3. Alles, M. G. (2015). Drivers of the Use and Facilitators and Obstacles of the Evolution of Big Data by the Audit Profession. Accounting Horizons, 29: 439-449. https://doi.org/10.2308/acch-51067
4. Almagrashi, A., Mujalli, A., Khan, T., & Attia, O. (2023). Factors Determining Internal Auditors’ Behavioral Intention To Use Computer-Assisted Auditing Techniques: An Extension Of The UTAUT Model And An Empirical Study. Future Business Journal, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s43093-023-00231-2.
5. AlNasrallah, W., and Saleem, F. (2022). Determinants of the Digitalization of Accounting in an Emerging Market: The Roles of Organizational Support and Job Relevance. Sustainability, 14: 6483. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14116483
6. Awang, Y., Shuhidan, S. M., Taib, A., Rashid, N., & Hasan, M. S. (2022). Digitalization of Accounting Profession: An Opportunity or a Risk for Future Accountants? Proceedings, 8, Article 93. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2022082093
7. Babayeva, A., and Manousaridis, N.-D. (2020). The Effects of Digitalization on Auditing— A Study Investigating the Benefits and Challenges of Digitalization on the Audit Profession. https://lup.lub.lu.se/student-papers/search/publication/9021291
8. Bambang, A., Kusumawati, A., Nimran, U., and Suharyono, S. (2021). The effect of spiritual marketing and entrepreneurship orientation on determining sustainable competitive advantage. The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 8(2): 231–241. https://www.kci.go.kr/kciportal/landing/article.kci?arti _id=ART002685719
9. Benitez, J., Castillo, A., Llorens, J., and Braojos, J. (2018). IT-enabled knowledge ambidexterity and innovation performance in small U.S. firms: The moderator role of social media capability. Information and Management, 55(1): 131–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2017.09.004
10. Bonsu MOA, Wang Y, and Guo Y (2023). Does fintech lead to better accounting practices? Empirical evidence. Accounting Research Journal, 36(2/3): 129-147. https://doi.org/10.1108/ARJ-07-2022-0178
11. Bresnahan, T. F., Brynjolfsson, E. & Hitt, L. M. (2002). Information technology, workplace organization, and the demand for skilled labor: Firm-level evidence. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 117(1), 339–376. https://doi.org/10.1162/003355302753399526
12. Brown, J. (2009). Democracy, Sustainability and Dialogic Accounting Technologies: Tak ing Pluralism Seriously. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 20: 313-342. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2008.08.002
13. Chang, H. Y. and Ma, C. A. (2019). Financial flexibility, managerial efficiency and firm life cycle on firm performance: An empirical analysis of Chinese listed firms. Journal of Advances in Management Research, 16(2): 168–180. https://doi.org/10.1108/JAMR-06-2017-0072
14. Chikelu, P., Nwigbo, S., Azaka, O., Olisakwe, H., and Chinweze, A. (2022). Modeling and simulation study for failure prevention of shredder rotor bearing system used for synthetic elastic material applications. Journal of Failure Analysis and Prevention, 22(4): 1566-1577.
15. Coglianese, C. and Ben Dor, L. M. (2020). AI in adjudication and administration. Brooklyn Law Review, 86: 791-838.
16. Collin, J. (2015). Digitalization and Dualistic IT. In J. Collin, K. Hiekkanen, J. J. Korhonen, M. Halén, T. Itälä, and M. Helenius (Eds.), IT Leadership in Transition: The Impact of Digitalization on Finnish Organizations (pp. 29-34). Aalto University.
17. Coman, D. M., Ionescu, C. A., Duică, A., Coman, M. D., Uzlau, M. C., Stanescu, S. G. et al. (2022). Digitization of Accounting: The Premise of the Paradigm Shift of Role of the Professional Accountant. Applied Sciences, 12: 3359. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12073359
18. Daragmeh, A., Sági, J., and Zéman, Z. (2021). Continuous intention to use e-wallet in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic: Integrating the health belief model (HBM) and technology continuous theory (TCT). Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 7(2), Article 132. https://doi.org/10.3390 /joitmc7020132
19. Dillard, J., and Brown, J. (2012). Agonistic Pluralism and Imagining CSEAR into the Future. Social and Environmental Accountability Journal, 32: 3-16. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969160x.2012.656403
20. Dong, H., Guo, J., Chen, T., and Murong, R. (2023). Configuration research on innovation performance of digital enterprises: Based on an open innovation and knowledge perspective. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 10: 953902. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2022.953902
21. Esfahbodi, A., Pang, G., & Peng, L. (2022). Determinants of consumers’ adoption intention for blockchain technology in e-commerce. Journal of Digital Economy, 1(2): 89–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdec.2022.11.001
22. Fabiani, S., Schivardi, F. & Trento, S. (2005). ICT adoption in Italian manufacturing: firm-level evidence. Industrial and Corporate Change, 14(2), 225–249. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dth050
23. Fajriyah, M., Budi, U., & Jakarta, L. (2024). Analysis Of The Influence Of System Quality, Perception Of Usability, And Perception Of Ease Of Use On User Satisfaction In BWS Mobile Banking With The Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) Approach. 5(9), 1104–1112. https://doi.org/10.46799/jst.v5i9.1005.
24. Forbes Insights (2014). Future Role of Audit: A More Insightful Audit for a More Complex World. https://www.forbes.com/forbesinsights/future_role_of_audit/
25. Friyani, R. and Hernando, R. (2021). The use of information technology in improving the quality of financial report in micro, small and medium enterprises. In Proceedings of the 3rd Green Development International Conference (GDIC 2020) (pp. 214–220). Atlantis Press. https://doi.org/10.2991/aer.k.210825.039
26. Gartner (2012). Digitalization. Gartner. https://www.gartner.com/en/information-technology/glossary/digitalization
27. Ghorbani, N. (2019). Determinants of digitalization in the accounting function: A quantitative study (Master's Thesis, Umea University).
28. Gibbs, J. L. & Kraemer, K. L. (2004). A cross-country investigation of the determinants of scope of e-commerce use: an institutional approach. Electronic Markets, 14(2), 124–137. https://doi.org/10.1080/10196780410001675077
29. Giunta, A. & Trivieri, F. (2007). Understanding the determinants of information technology adoption: evidence from Italian manufacturing firms. Applied Economics, 39(10), 1325– 1334. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036840600567678
30. Granić A, Marangunić N (2019) Technology acceptance model in educational context: A systematic literature review. British Journal of Educational Technology 50(5):2572–2593
31. Gulin, D., Hladika, M., and Valenta, I. (2019). Digitalization and the Challenges for the Accounting Profession. https://www.econstor.eu/handle/10419/207712
32. Hadi, A. H., Ali, M. N., Al-shiblawi, G. A. K., Flayyih, H. H., and Talab, H. R. (2023). The effects of information technology adoption on the financial reporting: Moderating role of audit risk. International Journal of Economics and Finance Studies, 15(1): 47-63.
33. Hasan, A., and Gupta, S. K. (2020). Exploring tourists’ behavioural intentions towards use of select mobile wallets for digital payments. Paradigm, 24(2): 177–194. https://doi.org/10.1177/0971890720959519
34. Hunton, J. E., and Rose, J. M. (2010). 21st Century Auditing: Advancing Decision Support Systems to Achieve Continuous Auditing. Accounting Horizons, 24: 297-312. https://doi.org/10.2308/acch.2010.24.2.297
35. ICAEW (2018). Understanding the Impact of Technology in Audit and Finance. https://www.icaew.com/-/media/corporate/files/middle-east-hub/understanding-the impact-of-technology-in-audit-and-finance.ashx
36. Jans, M., Aysolmaz, B., Corten, M., Joshi, A., and van Peteghem, M. (2022). Digitalization in Accounting-Warmly Embraced or Coldly Ignored? Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 36: 61-85. https://doi.org/10.1108/aaaj-11-2020-4998
37. Jans, M., Aysolmaz, B., Corten, M., Joshi, A., and van Peteghem, M. (2023). Digitalization in accounting–Warmly embraced or coldly ignored? Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 36(9): 61-85. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-11-2020-4998
38. Johansson, M. and Sjöberg, P (2016). Shaping the Future of the Auditing Profession in Sweden: A Study of the Expected Role of Digitalization. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Shaping-the-future-of-the-auditing-profession-in-a-Sj%C3%B6berg-Johansson/f2844e2b072c618d1d2ec5f64665e0f4b555a5fe
39. Knudsen, D. (2020). Elusive Boundaries, Power Relations, and Knowledge Production: A Systematic Review of the Literature on Digitalization in Accounting. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 36: 100441. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accinf.2019.100441
40. Knudsen, E. S., Lien, L. B., Timmermans, B., Belik, I., and Pandey, S. (2021). Stability in turbulent times? The effect of digitalization on the sustainability of competitive advantage. Journal of Business Research, 128: 360-369. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.02.008
41. Kruskopf, S., Lobbas, C., Meinander, H., Söderling, K., Martikainen, M., and Lehner, O. (2020). Digital Accounting and the Human Factor: Theory and Practice. ACRN Journal of Finance and Risk Perspectives, 9, 78-89. https://doi.org/10.35944/jofrp.2020.9.1.006
42. Liébana-Cabanillas, F., Japutra, A., Molinillo, S., Singh, N., and Sinha, N. (2020). Assessment of mobile technology use in the emerging market: Analyzing intention to use m-payment services in India. Telecommunications Policy, 44(9) 102009. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2020.102009
43. Lombardi, D. R., Bloch, R., and Vasarhelyi, M. A. (2014). The Future of Audit. Journal of Information Systems and Technology Management, 11: 21-32. https://doi.org/10.4301/s1807-17752014000100002
44. Lombardi, D. R., Bloch, R., and Vasarhelyi, M. A. (2015). The Current State and Future of the Audit Profession. Current Issues in Auditing, 9, P10-P16. https://doi.org/10.2308/ciia-50988
45. Love, P. E., Irani, Z., Standing, C., Lin, C. & Burn, J. M. (2005). The enigma of evaluation: benefits, costs and risks of IT in Australian small-medium-sized enterprises. Information \& Management, 42(7), 947–964. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2004.10.004
46. Manita, R., Elommal, N., Baudier, P., and Hikkerova, L. (2020). The Digital Transformation of External Audit and Its Impact on Corporate Governance. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 150: 119751. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2019.119751
47. Marbun, S. G., Saputro, J. A., and Subiyakto, H. (2021). Intention to use virtual account-based tuition payment system with UTAUT model and computer self-efficacy: Initial trust as moderator. IOSR Journal of Business and Management, 23(10): 9–18. https://www.iosrjournals.org/iosr-jbm/papers/Vol23-issue10/Ser-3 /B2310030918.pdf
48. McGhee, P., and Grant, P. (2019). Educating for Sustainability-as-Flourishing. In G. Eweje, and R. Bathurst, (Eds.), Clean, Green and Responsible? (pp. 47-64). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-21436-4_4
49. Melin, C., and Toezay, G. (2022). The Effects of Digitalization on the Audit Profession—A Comparative Study between One Developed and One Developing Country. https://researchportal.hkr.se/ws/portalfiles/portal/44024928/The_effects_of_digitaliza tion_on_the_audit_profession_.pdf
50. Moffitt, K. C., Rozario, A. M., and Vasarhelyi, M. A. (2018). Robotic Process Automation for Auditing. Journal of Emerging Technologies in Accounting, 15, 1-10.
51. Mohan, S. A., Quraishi, M., and Nguyen, T., N. (2023). The Unrealized Potential of Artificial Intelligence, Big Data and Analytics, and Blockchain in Accounting: A Literature Review. International Journal of Information Management Sciences, 7: 23-40.
52. Mujalli, A., Khan, T., and Almgrashi, A. (2022). University accounting students and faculty members using the Blackboard platform during COVID-19; Proposed modification of the UTAUT model and an empirical study. Sustainability, 14(4), 23-60. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14042360
53. Nguyen, D. and Gopalaswamy, A. K. (2018). The Interface between Electronic Banking and Accounting Modules. Journal of Advances in Management Research, 15: 241-264. https://doi.org/10.1108/jamr-04-2017-0048
54. Nurqamarani, A. S., Sogiarto, E., & Nurlaeli, N. (2021). Technology Adoption in Small Medium Enterprises based on Technology Acceptance Model: A Critical Review. Journal of Information Systems Engineering and Business Intelligence, 7(2), 162. https://doi.org/10.20473/jisebi.7.2.162-172.
55. OECD (2015). OECD digital economy Outlook 2015. Organisation for Economic Co operation and Development. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264232440-en
56. Okoli, B. E. (2011). Evaluation of the accounting systems used by small scale enterprises in Nigeria: The case of Enugu- South East Nigeria. Asian Journal of Business Management, 3, 235-240. Retrieved from http://www.maxwellsci.com/
57. Olisakwe, H. C., Ikpambeseb, K. K., Ipilakyaab, T. D., and Odeha, C. P. (2023). Effect of ternarization on corrosion inhibitive properties of extracts of Strangler fig bark, Neem leaves and Bitter leave on mild steel in acidic medium.
58. Olisakwe, H. C., Osazuwa, O. K., Chukwuneke, J. L., and Ezeanyanwu, C. S. (2024). Inhibitive effect of Mangifera indica extract on mild steel in hydrochloric acid solution. Civil Engineering and Environmental Sciences, 10(2): 067-072. Peertechz Publications Inc.
59. Ouda, H. A. G. and Klischewski, R. (2019). Accounting and politicians: A theory of accounting information usefulness. Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting and Financial Management, 31(4): 496–517. https://doi.org /10.1108/JPBAFM-10-2018-0113
60. Pourghanbari, F., Yazdifar, H., and Faghani, M. (2022). Investigating the factors affecting accountants’ behavioral intentions in accounting information system adoption: Empirical evidence of unified theory of acceptance and use of technology, and task-fit model. Iranian Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Finance, 6(3): 111–126. https://doi.org/10.22067/ijaaf.2022.42040
61. Raphael, J. (2017). Rethinking the Audit. Journal of Accountancy. https://www.journalofaccountancy.com/issues/2017/apr/rethinking-the-audit.html
62. Ratzinger-Sakel, N. V. S., and Gray, G. L. (2015). Moving toward a Learned Profession and Purposeful Integration: Quantifying the Gap between the Academic and Practice Com munities in Auditing and Identifying New Research Opportunities. Journal of Account ing Literature, 35: 77-103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acclit.2015.10.002
63. Rogers, D. Alan (2016). Examining Small Business Adoption of Computerized Accounting Systems Using the Technology Acceptance Model (Doctoral Dissertation, Walden University).
64. Saleem, A., Aslam, J., Kim, Y. B., Nauman, S., and Khan, N. T. (2022). Motives towards e-shopping adoption among Pakistani consumers: An application of the technology acceptance model and theory of reasoned action. Sustainability, 14(7), Article 4180. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14074180
65. Semlambo, A. A., Almasi, K., and Liechuka, Y. (2022). Perceived usefulness and ease of use of online examination system: A case of Institute of Accountancy Arusha. International Journal of Scientific Research and Management, 10(4): 851–861. https://doi.org/10.18535/ijsrm/v10i4.ec08
66. Shaughnessy, H. and Goulding, F. (2021). Sprinting to digital transformation: A time boxed, agile approach. Strategy and Leadership, 49(1): 18–24. https://doi.org/10.1108/SL-12-2020-0157
67. Singh, N., and Sinha, N. (2020). How perceived trust mediates merchant’s intention to use a mobile wallet technology. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 52: 101894. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser .2019.101894
68. Smith, J. (2020). The Role of Automation in Modern Accounting. Journal of Accounting and Finance, 35(2): 112 126.
69. Tahar, A., Riyadh, H. A., Sofyani, H., and Purnomo, W. E. (2020). Perceived ease of use, perceived usefulness, perceived security and intention to use e-filing: The role of technology readiness. The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 7(9): 537–547. https://doi.org/10.13106/jafeb.2020.vol7.no9.537
70. Tambunan, N. A. D. P. (2023). Analyzing factors influencing accounting application adoption using the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT) model among F&B MSMEs in West Java. Journal Integration of Management Studies, 1(1): 124–135. https://doi.org/10.58229/jims.v1i1.36
71. Tang, Y. (2023). A study of the impact of digital technology capabilities on firm performance — A moderated mediation model. Accounting and Corporate Management, 5(10): 91–99. https://doi.org/10.23977 /acccm.2023.051014
72. Teo, T. S., Tan, M. & Buk, W. K. (1997). A contingency model of Internet adoption in Singapore. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 2(2), 95–118. https://doi.org/10.1080/10864415.1997.11518310
73. Tiberius, V., and Hirth, S. (2019). Impacts of Digitization on Auditing: A Delphi Study for Germany. Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, 37: 100288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intaccaudtax.2019.100288
74. Tosun, E. C., Tecel, A., and Atai, G. (2013). Judicial Development of Accounting in Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus. n.p.,196-226.
75. Troshani, I., Locke, J., and Rowbottom, N. (2019). Transformation of accounting through digital standardisation: Tracing the construction of the IFRS taxonomy. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 32(1): 133–162. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-11-2016-2794
76. Vărzaru, A. A., Bocean, C. G., Rotea, C. C., and Budică-Iacob, A.-F. (2021). Assessing antecedents of behavioral intention to use mobile technologies in e-commerce. Electronics, 10(18): 2231. https://doi.org/10.3390 /electronics10182231
77. Verkasalo H (2008) Dynamics of mobile service adoption. International Journal of E-Business Research (IJEBR) 4(3):40–63
78. Wicaksono, A. R., Maulina, E., Rizal, M., & Purnomo, M. (2023). Technology Accepted Model (Tam): Applications in Accounting Systems. Journal of Law and Sustainable Development, 11(5), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.55908/sdgs.v11i5.547.
79. Williamson, K, and Johanson, G (Eds.). (2017). Research methods: Information, systems, and contexts. N.p: Chandos Publishing.
الحقوق الفكرية (c) 2025 Mohammad Emran Abu Afifeh , Ayşem İyikal Çelebi

هذا العمل مرخص حسب الرخصة Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
