The Impact of Kurdish Referendum on the Driving Forces of Turkish Foreign policy Toward KRG

Shokhan Sherzad Qader; Prof. Dr. Mohammed Ihsan

doi:10.33193/JALHSS.54.2020.147

Shokhan Sherzad Qader PhD Student - Department of political science- faculty of law, political science and management- soran university- Iraq
Prof. Dr. Mohammed Ihsan Senior Research Fellow at Defense Studies Research – King’s College – London - England

DOI: https://doi.org/10.33193/JALHSS.54.2020.147

الملخص

The justice and Development party (AKP – Adalet ve Kalkinma Partisi) has been the ruling party from the first elections they contested in 2002. Turkey’s policy has changed throughout the time, especially after AKP has been the ruling party continually since 2002, major shifts could be noticed. More importantly the dimensions of Turkey’s policy in the Middle East transferred to a broader status, especially when Turkey turned away to EU; at the same time EU started to review their policy toward Turkey, this impacted Turkey to focus more on the Middle East issues. So Turkey could be clearly seen that it has been presented in many countries and many events and changes in the Middle East, such as Syria, Iraq and the rest. Kurdistan Regional Government (KRG) as a part of that has taken its share in this policy orientation by Turkey, especially when the prominent personality Ahmet Davutoglu started to apply his “Strategic Depth” doctrines and declared for “zero problems” with neighbors, at the same time Turkey has set some priorities for their foreign policy orientation and those orientation is containing some driving forces of foreign policy toward the neighboring countries. So these driving forces had started to shape the Turkish foreign policy toward Middle East and particularly toward KRG, and this had led to very strong relations in many aspects till the referendum. However when KRG underwent a referendum in 25^th September 2017 in order to completely split from Iraq and establish its own state. Turkey, which is one of the countries that has great significance in many aspects for KRG, too, opposed the referendum. That’s why after the referendum a very clear deterioration could be noticed temporarily, but due to politico –economic relations, Turkey’s soft instrument foreign policy, and security emphasis led the relations of both sides to still stay in a stable condition.

المراجع

1. Akçay, B. and Yilmaz, B., 2013. Turkey's accession to the European Union political and economic challenges. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
2. Aktas, G. Y., 2010. Turkish Foreign Policy: New Concepts and Reflections. Master Thesis: Middle East Technical University.
3. Candar, C., 2013. Turgut Özal Twenty Years After: The Man and The Politician. Insight Turkey, 15(2), pp. 27-26
4. Davutoglu, A., 2008. Turkey’s Foreign Policy Vision: An Assessment of 2007. Insight Turkey, 10(1), pp. 77-96.
5. Demir, Y., 2017. Turkey's foreign policy towards the Middle East under the shadow of the Arab Spring. Newcastle upon Tyne, UK: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
6. Dogangil, S. G., 2013. Analysing Turkish Foreign Policy Under the AKP Governments Between 2002 and 2013: Is Turkey Moving Away From The European Union?. Master Thesis: London School of Economics and Political Science (LSE).
7. Elhusseini, F., 2018. The Arab Spring effect on Turkey's role, decision-making and foreign policy. Newcastle upon Tyne, UK: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
8. Grigoriadis, I. N., 2010. Davutoglu Doctrine and Turkish Foreign Policy. Hellenic Foundation For European and Foreign Policy (ELIAMP), April.pp. 1-11.
9. Gursoy, Y., 2010. Democratization and Foreign Policy Reforms in Turkey: Europeanization of Turkish Politics?. International Journal of Legal Information, 38(2), pp. 227-234.
10. Heper, M., 2013. Islam, Conservatism, and Democracy in Turkey: Comparing Turgut Özal and Recep Tayyip Erdoğan. Insight Turkey, 16 September, 15(2), pp. 141-156.
11. Huseyin Bagci and Suay Nilhan Acikalin, 2015. From Chaos to Cosmos: Strategic Depth and Turkish Foreign Policy in Syria. In: Chaos, Complexity and Leadership 2013. Ankara: Springer, pp. 11-25.
12. Inat, K., 2014. Transformation of Turkish Foreign Policy Capacity: The AK Party Era. Turkish Journal of Middle Eastern Studies, pp. 1-24.
13. Kara, M., 2011. 'Axis Shift' in Turkish Foreign Policy during AKP Administration: New Fundamental Foreign Policy Principles and Challenges. Master of Arts in International Relations: East Mediterranean University.
14. Karatasli, S. S., 2015. The Origins of Turkey’s “Heterodox” Transition to Neoliberalism: The Ozal Decade and Beyond. JOURNAL OF WORLD-SYSTEMS RESEARCH, 21(2), pp. 338-416.
15. Khalifa, M., 2017. Turkish Foreign Policy in the Middle East After Arab Spring. International Relations and Diplomacy: David Publishing, Volume 5, pp. 102-111.
16. Malinauskas, A., 2015. Turkey's foreign policy preferences and the impact of first direct presidential elections. Russian Journal of Political Studies, 2(2), pp.61-66.
17. Reynolds, M. A., 2012. ECHOES OF EMPIRE: Turkey's Crisis of Kemalism and The Search For An Alternative Foreign Policy. Saban Center for Middle East Policy at Brookings and Center on the United States and Europe at Brookings, pp. 1-33.
18. Tashjian, Y., 2012. From Conceptualization to Implementation and Revaluation: Turkey's "Strategic Dpeth" in the MENA Region. Strategic Outlook: Adequatio intellectes et rei, pp. 1-27.
19. Turan, K., 2012. Changes in Turkish Foreign Policy: A Shift or a Passing Interest. Akademik Bakis, 6(11), pp. 65-84.
20. Tziarras, Z., 2014. Turkish Foreign Policy Towards the Middle East Under The AKP (2002-2013): A Neoclassical Realist Account. PhD Dissertaion: The University of WARWICK.
21. Yuksel, U., 2016. Change and Continiuty: Turkish Foreign Policy Since 2002, Under the Justice and Development Party (Adalet ve Kalkinma Partisi -AKP). CUNY Academic Works, pp. 1-65.