Legal Regulation of Technical Expertise Procedures in proving written Forgery in Palestinian Legislation

  • Saleh Samih Al Samna Doctor of Law, Lawyer
  • Abdul Fattah bin Wan Ismail Professor at the University of Humanities Malaysia
الكلمات المفتاحية: technical expertise, forgery, technical expert

الملخص

Technical expertise is considered one of the important issues that should be highlighted due to its importance in criminal matters in general, and cases of proving forgery in particular. This study aims primarily to shed light on the extent to which the Palestinian legislator organizes the procedures of technical expertise in proving forgery. Linear, as the importance of the study highlights the analysis of the Palestinian legislative reality in how to combat the crime of forgery of official documents and ways to confront it by stating the procedures of the technical expert to reveal the areas of forgery in written documents. This study discusses the main problem represented in the extent to which the texts of Palestinian legislation organize the rules governing technical expertise and its procedures in proving a forgery claim. To achieve the purpose of the study, the researchers followed the analytical approach, where they analyzed the legal texts regulating the provisions of technical expertise and its procedures in proving a written forgery claim, by examining the law Evidence and the Criminal Procedures Law, and analyzing the content and substance of those legal texts that directly or indirectly addressed provisions and issues related to written expertise, sorting them out and discussing them scientifically, in addition to analyzing the statements and opinions presented by scholars and researchers specializing in their study of aspects of this topic.

المراجع

1. ABen Omrani, Mohamed and Farhat, Suleiman. (2018). The principle of confrontation between opponents and its impact on a fair trial. (Master’s thesis). Ahmed University Daria-Adrar-College Humanities, Social Sciences and Islamic Sciences.
2. Abu Al-Rus, Ahmed. Crimes of forgery, counterfeiting, bribery and embezzlement of public funds from a legal perspective. Modern University Office.
3. Abu Amer, Mohamed Zaki. (2017). The Penal Code, “Special Section”. Egypt: University Publications House.
4. Abu Amer, Muhammad Zaki. (1984). Criminal Procedures. Alexandria: Dar Al-Matbouat Al-Jami’a Al-Faniya for Publishing.
5. Abu Malouh, Musa Suleiman.( 2012). Explanation of the Evidence Law No. (4) of 2001. 3rd ed. Gaza: Al-Quds Library.
6. Al Thani, Maha Mansour Salman Jassim. (2011). Expertise in Civil and Commercial Matters According to Qatari Law. Fifth Training Course for Judicial Assistants.
7. Al-Bakri, Muhammad Azmi. (2017). Challenging denial and claiming forgery. Cairo: Dar Mahmoud for Publishing and Distribution.
8. Al-Bakri, Muhammad Azmi. The Law of Evidence in Civil and Commercial Matters. Part Two. Egypt.T.D
9. Al-Shahawy, Muhammad . (2013). Rules and Methods of Proving a Claim. Dr. M. D. N.
10. Al-Shanouji, Hasnaa. (2009-2011). The role of judicial expertise as a means of proof in forgery crimes. End-of-training research. Kingdom of Morocco: Ministry of Justice.
11. Al-Shanouji, Hasnaa. 2011. The Role of Judicial Expertise as a Means of Proof in Forgery Crimes. Morocco: The Higher Institute of the Judiciary.
12. Al-Shawarby, Abdel Hamid. Forgery and Counterfeiting in Civil and Criminal Cases. Egypt: Dar Al-Maaref.T.D
13. Basla, Riyad Fathallah. (2005). The Limits of Scientific Proof in Cases of Forgery and Counterfeiting. 1st ed. Cairo: Dar Nubar.
14. Ibn Abbad, Ismail. 385-326 AH. Al-Muheet in Language. Edited by Sheikh Muhammad Hasan Al Yassin. 1st ed. Beirut: Dar Al-Kutub Al-Ilmiyyah. 1414 AH.
15. Ibn Manzur, Al-Ansari. (1993 AD.) Lisan Al-Arab. Vol. 2. Lebanon: Dar Sader Beyout Lebanon.
16. Ibn Manzur, Jamal al-Din Muhammad ibn Makram. (1990). Lisan al-Arab. Vol. 4. Beirut: Dar Sadir.
17. Ibn Manzur. (1988 AD). Lisan al-Arab. Lebanon: Dar al-Jabal.
18. Ibn Manzur. (1992). Lisan al-Arab. Volume Four. Beirut: Dar Sadir.
19. Ibn Manzur. Muhammad bin Makram. (1413) AH. Lisan al-Arab. 3rd ed. Beirut: Dar Ihya al-Turath al-Arabi.
20. Ibn Tabal, Issam. (2014). Customary contracts as a means of proof in Algerian legislation. A memorandum submitted to fulfill the requirements for an academic bachelor’s degree. University of Kasdi Merbah, Ouargla.
21. Onion. Riad Fathallah. (2001). The Limits of Scientific Proof in Cases of Forgery and Counterfeiting. Cairo: Union of Arab Banks.
22. Shanikat, Murad Mahmoud. (2008). Proof by inspection and expertise in civil law. First edition. Jordan: Dar Al Thaqafa for Publishing and Distribution.
23. Shnayur, Abdul Nasser. (2005). Proof by Expertise between Islamic Judiciary and International Law and its Contemporary Applications. Jordan: Dar Al-Nafayes.
24. Union of Arab Banks. (2020). Practical applications in combating forgery and fraud in banking. Lebanon.
منشور
2025-04-23
كيفية الاقتباس
Saleh Samih Al Samna, & Abdul Fattah bin Wan Ismail. (2025). Legal Regulation of Technical Expertise Procedures in proving written Forgery in Palestinian Legislation. Journal of Arts, Literature, Humanities and Social Sciences, (119), 339-369. https://doi.org/10.33193/JALHSS.119.2025.1403
القسم
المقالات