Employing Peer Feedback

(Improving English Writing Proficiency Among Intermediate School Students in Second Language Writing Settings)

  • Mohammed Majed Mohammed Murad Palestine
الكلمات المفتاحية: Peer Feedback, Writing Proficiency, Intermediate School Students, Effectiveness

الملخص

English writing proficiency is a crucial skill for second language learners, yet traditional teaching methods often fall short in effectively enhancing students' writing abilities. Peer feedback has emerged as a promising approach to address this challenge, fostering collaborative learning environments and providing students with valuable feedback on their writing. Despite the growing interest in peer feedback, there remains a need to investigate its effectiveness in improving English writing proficiency among intermediate school students in second language writing settings. A quantitative research approach utilizing questionnaires was employed to gather data from 80 intermediate school students in Palestine. The study underscores the importance of incorporating peer feedback activities into English writing instruction to enhance students' writing proficiency and foster collaborative learning environments.

المراجع

1. Berggren, J. (2015). Learning from giving feedback: A study of secondary-level students. ELT Journal, 69(1), 58–70.
2. Brannon, L., & Knoblauch, C. H. (1982). On students' rights to their own texts: A model of teacher response. College Composition and Communication, 33(2), 157–166.
3. Chaudron, C. (1987). Analysis of Products and Instructional Approaches in Writing: Two Articles on the State of the Art: Introduction. Tesol Quarterly, 21(4), 673–675.
4. Cho, Y. H., & Cho, K. (2011). Peer reviewers learn from giving comments. Instructional Science, 39(5), 629–643.
5. Corbin, B. (2012). Improving L2 Peer Feedback.
6. Dheram, P. K. (1995). Feedback as a two-bullock cart: A case study of teaching writing. ELT Journal, 49(2), 160–168.
7. Farrah, M. (2012). The impact of peer feedback on improving the writing skills among Hebron University students. An-Najah University Journal for Research, 26(1), 179–210.
8. Ferris, D. (1995). Students reactions to teacher response in multiple draft composition classrooms. TESOL Quarterly, 29, 33–53.
9. Ferris, D. R., Pezone, S., Tade, C. R., & Tinti, S. (1997). Teacher commentary on student writing: Descriptions & implications. Journal of Second Language Writing, 6(2), 155–182.
10. Huisman, B., Saab, N., Van Driel, J., & Van den Broek, P. (2018). Peer feedback on academic writing: Undergraduate students’ peer feedback role, peer feedback perceptions and essay performance. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 43(6), 955–968.
11. Kepner, C. G. (1991). An experiment in the relationship of types of written feedback to the development of second-language writing skills. The Modern Language Journal, 75(3), 305–313.
12. Khalil, E. (2018). The efficacy of peer feedback in Turkish EFL students’ writing performance. Journal of Literature and Art Studies, 8(6), 920–931.
13. Koka, A., & Hein, V. (2006). Perceptions of teachers’ general and informational feedback and intrinsic motivation in physical education: two-year effects. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 103, 321–332.
14. Leki, I. (1991). The preference of ESL students for error correction in college-level writing classes. Foreign Language Annals, 24, 203–218.
15. Liu, E. Z., Lin, S. S., Chiu, C., & Yuan, S. (2001). Web-based peer review: The learner as both adapter and reviewer. IEEE Transactions on Education, 44, 246–251.
16. Liu, J., & Hansen, J. (2002). Peer Response in Second Language Writing Classrooms. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
17. Lu, J., & Law, N. (2012). Online Peer Assessment: Effects of Cognitive and Affective Feedback. Instructional Science: An International Journal of the Learning Sciences, 40(2), 257–275.
18. Mangelsdorf, K. (1992). Peer reviews in the ESL composition classroom: What do the students think? ELT Journal, 46(3), 274–284.
19. Mendonca, C. O., & Johnson, K. E. (1994). Peer review negotiations: Revision activities in ESL writing instruction. TESOL Quarterly, 28(4), 745–769.
20. Min, H. T. (2005). Training students to become successful peer reviewers. System, 33(2), 293–308.
21. Radecki, P. M., & Swales, J. M. (1988). ESL student reaction to written comments on their written work. System, 16(3), 355–365.
22. Rollinson, P. (2005). Using peer feedback in the ESL writing class. ELT Journal, 59(1), 23–30.
23. Topping, K. J. (2000). Peer Assisted Learning: A Practical Guide for Teachers. Cambridge, MA: Brookline Books.
24. Torwong, P. (2003). Peer Response Technique: A Proposed Model for EFL Writing (Unpublished PhD. dissertation). Suranaree University of Technology.
25. Truscott, J. (1996). The case against grammar correction in L2 writing classes. Language Learning, 46(2), 327–369.
26. Wichmann, A., Funk, A., & Rummel, N. (2018). Leveraging the potential of peer feedback in an academic writing activity through sense-making support. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 33(1), 165–184.
27. Zamel, V. (1985). Responding to student writing. TESOL Quarterly, 19(1), 79–101.
منشور
2024-05-18
كيفية الاقتباس
Mohammed Majed Mohammed Murad. (2024). Employing Peer Feedback: (Improving English Writing Proficiency Among Intermediate School Students in Second Language Writing Settings). Journal of Arts, Literature, Humanities and Social Sciences, (105), 450-461. https://doi.org/10.33193/JALHSS.105.2024.1114
القسم
المقالات